ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Advances in rational drug design and recent clinical trials are leading to emergence of a range of novel therapies for SLE and therapeutic options in clinical practice are expected to broaden rapidly. The optimal real-world place of emerging and established agents will be guided by understanding their differential efficacy on specific SLE manifestations as well as efficacy for more resistant disease. Anifrolumab, a type-I interferon receptor blocking monoclonal antibody, showed efficacy in SLE in phase III trials with a notable effect on mucocutaneous disease although specific lesion subtypes and chroncicity were not explored. Severe refractory mucocutaneous SLE such as scarring discoid lesions are an important and common clinical challenge in current practice. We therefore prospectively evaluated the real-world efficacy and quality of life impact of anifolumab for active mucocutaneous SLE, recalcitrant to multiple biologic and immunosuppressant therapies. Methods Seven patients commenced anifrolumab (300mg by monthly iv infusion) following application to the manufacturer's early access programme (NCT 04750057). Prior biologic therapies were discontinued at least 5 half-lives in advance. Mucocutaneous disease activity was captured by Cutaneous Lupus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) activity score and medical photography. Patient reported health-related quality of life comprising the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI);Lupus-QoL and EQ5D-5L were evaluated at baseline, three and six months. Results Seven female patients with active mucocutaneous SLE (Discoid LE n=5, chilblain LE n=1, subacute cutaneous LE n=1) and median disease duration of 17 years were evaluated. Median baseline CLASI activity score was 17 (range 10-26;higher scores indicating severe disease). Median number of previously failed therapies was 7 and included rituximab in 6/7, belimumab in 2/7 and thalidomide in 4/7. Rapid resolution of scale and erythema in DLE was established within 1 month of anifrolumab treatment. Improvements to chilblain lupus were evident by three months. CLASI activity score was improved >=75% in all patients at 3 months. Clinical responses were associated with significant improvements in DLQI (p<0.001) and EQ5D-VAS (p=0.002) by three months. Lupus-QoL trended toward improvement across all domains but most strongly for fatigue (p=0.01) and pain (p=0.002) by 6 months. One patient discontinued treatment after 4 months due to polydermatomal shingles complicated by sensorineural hearing loss. Infection coincided with background prednisolone dose >15mg daily, recent COVID-19 infection and new on-treatment hypogammaglobulinaemia (IgG <5g/L). Prolonged aciclovir treatment was required for lesion resolution. Conclusion We report rapid real-world efficacy and quality of life impact of anifrolumab on highly refractory mucocutaneous SLE, which exceeded that anticipated from existing clinical trial data. Findings suggest a unique role for emerging interferon targeting therapies in management of mucocutaneous SLE but emphasize need for enhanced VZV precautions among higher risk patients.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims The immune response to SARS-CoV-2 is known to be reduced in the immunocompromised. However, extent to which immunity is affected by immunosuppression in specific disease cohorts remains poorly characterised. Furthermore, implications of the ongoing vaccination booster programme require further study. Individuals with lupus nephritis (LN) require prolonged high-dose immunosuppression in order to maintain disease control, rendering them important to study in this context. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike antibody response in this cohort during the Spring/Summer 2022 booster vaccine campaign. Nucleocapsid antibody indicates previous infection whilst spike antibody indicates previous infection and/or vaccination response. Titre of spike antibody to prevent infection is not known, but presence of antibodies is likely to protect against severe disease. Methods SARS-CoV-2 spike and nucleocapsid antibody were measured in adult patients with LN attending a tertiary centre rheumatology clinic. Data was collected retrospectively on disease, immunosuppression, vaccine status and history of natural exposure. Results 35 cases of LN were investigated, of which LN III, IV and V were predominant biopsy diagnoses. Regarding immunosuppressants, the Eurolupus Cyclophosphamide protocol had been used in the majority of patients to achieve initial control, with 3/35 patients still receiving pulsed courses at data collection. 18/35 were on Mycophenolate Mofetil;a further 13/35 had previously received this. 31/35 took at least 5mg Prednisolone daily;25/35 took Hydroxychloroquine;7/35 took Azathioprine;7/35 had previously been on Methotrexate, 3/35 took Tacrolimus;1/35 took Ciclosporin. Regarding B-cell depleting monoclonal antibody therapy, 13/35 had received Rituximab and 8/35 were receiving Belimumab. Antibody levels were measured between 4 weeks and 13 months after last dose of vaccination;mean duration was 6 months. 11/35 had confirmed COVID-19 infection;a further 8/35 reported a possible history. Of the 35, 32 (91%) had mounted detectable SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody above the bottom 10% of assay detection, indicating some immunity to vaccination or natural exposure. 20 (57%) had detectable nucleocapsid antibody, suggesting natural infection with antibody response. Only 2 (6%) had not mounted any antibody response. Of note, neither were fully vaccinated: one had 1 vaccination with blood test 8 months subsequent;one had 2 vaccinations with blood test 7 months subsequent. The latter was also notably on haemodialysis. All who received 3+ vaccinations had detectable spike antibody responses, as well as 75% of those who had received 2 vaccinations. Conclusion Our study is the first analysis, to our knowledge, of SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in a LN cohort. Whilst neutralising capacity and level of antibody providing protection remains under research, these findings provide at least some reassurance that individuals with LN on immunosuppression are capable of mounting an immune response against SARS-CoV-2. Further work is required to establish extent and duration of protection with serial vaccinations in this cohort.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Since the COVID-19 outbreak the rheumatology community have been concerned about the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients prescribed immunosuppressing medications. Data suggests that patients receiving Rrtuximab are at increased risk of developing severe outcomes from COVID-19 (1). In our unit all patients receiving rituximab were selected to receive a targeted vaccination and booster programme with all patients receiving at least 2 vaccinations and up to 3 booster vaccinations. We studied the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines in rituximab patients, by checking the the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S (Spike) IgG/IgM total antibody levels post vaccination. Our aim was to assess the vaccination response in patients receiving rituximab and to offer advice on continued shielding or alternatively passive immunization with tixagevimab/cilgavimab in those patients who did not mount a response. Methods Taking 39 patients currently on rituximab therapy, we measured Anti- SARS-CoV-2-S (Spike) antibody levels post vaccination. We recorded whether the test was positive or negative, and the numerical result. We recorded rituximab dates of administration and dates of vaccines. We also recorded diagnosis, co-prescribed DMARDs, immunoglobulin levels, white cell and lymphocyte counts. We took record of whether or not the patient subsequently contracted COVID-19, required a hospital admission, ICU or died. Results Of our 39 patients, 21 had Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S (Spike) antibody levels checked. Of these patients, 7 (33%) had a negative spike protein result. Of the patients with a positive result, 8 (38%) had an antibody level between 0-250U/ML, and only 6 (28.6%) had a level >250U/ML (The manufacturer advises that a level above 0.8U/ML is a positive result). Of patients with a negative result, 1 patient had received 3 vaccines, 5 patients had received 4, and 1 patient had 5. All of the patients had received a vaccine >4 weeks prior to receiving the drug. Two patients were co-prescribed Belimumab, 3 were co-prescribed low-dose methotrexate and 2 were not on additional disease modifying agents. The diagnoses of these patients were, 2 patients with SLE, 4 with SPRA, and 1 MPO Vasculitis. There were no significant findings in lymphocyte count, white cell count or immunoglobulin levels. Conclusion These findings suggest that our current COVID-19 vaccination and booster programme may not provide adequate response in patients receiving rituximab therapy. Despite this being a small cohort, these results show that 33% of patients have not mounted a vaccine response and this is concerning. We suggest that vaccine response should be checked in all patients receiving rituximab therapy and those patients who do not mount a vaccine response should be offered passive immunity and advised of possible additional risks regarding COVID-19 exposure.
ABSTRACT
Background/Aims Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are commonly treated with immunosuppressors and are prone to infections. Recently introduced mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines have demonstrated extraordinary efficacy across all ages. Immunosuppressed patients were excluded from phase III trials with SARS-We aim to fully characterize B and T cell immune responses elicited by mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic diseases under immunotherapies, and to identify which drugs reduce vaccine's immunogenicity. Methods Humoral, CD4 and CD8 immune responses were investigated in 147 SARS-Cov2-naive patients with selected rheumatic diseases under immunosuppression after a two-dose regimen of SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccine. Responses were compared with age, gender, and diseasematched IMRD patients not receiving immunosuppressors and with healthy controls Results IMRD patients showed decreased seroconversion rates (63% vs 100%, p=0.04) and cellular immune responses (59% vs 100%, p=0.007). Patients on methotrexate achieved seroconversion in 62% of cases and cellular responses in 80% of cases. Abatacept deeply affected humoral and cellular responses. Rituximab (31% responders) and belimumab (50% responders) showed severely impaired humoral responses but cellular responses were often preserved. Antibody titers were reduced with mycophenolate and azathioprine but preserved with leflunomide. Conclusion IMRD patients exhibit impaired SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-immunogenicity, variably reduced with immunosuppressors. Among commonly used therapies, abatacept and B-cell depleting therapies show the most deleterious effects, while anticytokines preserved immunogenicity. The effects of cumulative methotrexate and glucocorticoid doses on immunogenicity should be considered. Humoral and cellular responses are weakly correlated, but CD4 and CD8 tightly correlate. Seroconversion alone might not reflect the vaccine's immunogenicity.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are at an increased risk of infection relative to the general population. We aimed to describe the frequency and risk factors for serious infections in patients with moderate-to-severe SLE treated with rituximab, belimumab, and standard of care therapies in a large national observational cohort. Method(s): The British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Biologics Register (BILAG-BR) is a UK-based prospective register of patients with SLE. Patients were recruited by their treating physician as part of their scheduled care from 64 centres across the UK by use of a standardised case report form. Inclusion criteria for the BILAG-BR included age older than 5 years, ability to provide informed consent, a diagnosis of SLE, and starting a new biological therapy within the last 12 months or a new standard of care drug within the last month. The primary outcome for this study was the rate of serious infections within the first 12 months of therapy. Serious infections were defined as those requiring intravenous antibiotic treatment, hospital admission, or resulting in morbidity or death. Infection and mortality data were collected from study centres and further mortality data were collected from the UK Office for National Statistics. The relationship between serious infection and drug type was analysed using a multiple-failure Cox proportional hazards model. Finding(s): Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 23, 2021, 1383 individuals were recruited to the BILAG-BR. 335 patients were excluded from this analysis. The remaining 1048 participants contributed 1002.7 person-years of follow-up and included 746 (71%) participants on rituximab, 119 (11%) participants on belimumab, and 183 (17%) participants on standard of care. The median age of the cohort was 39 years (IQR 30-50), 942 (90%) of 1048 patients were women and 106 (10%) were men. Of the patients with available ethnicity data, 514 (56%) of 911 were White, 169 (19%) were Asian, 161 (18%) were Black, and 67 (7%) were of multiple-mixed or other ethnic backgrounds. 118 serious infections occurred in 76 individuals during the 12-month study period, which included 92 serious infections in 58 individuals on rituximab, eight serious infections in five individuals receiving belimumab, and 18 serious infections in 13 individuals on standard of care. The overall crude incidence rate of serious infection was 117.7 (95% CI 98.3-141.0) per 1000 person-years. Compared with standard of care, the serious infection risk was similar in the rituximab (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.68 [0.60-4.68]) and belimumab groups (1.01 [0.21-4.80]). Across the whole cohort in multivariate analysis, serious infection risk was associated with prednisolone dose (>10 mg;2.38 [95%CI 1.47-3.84]), hypogammaglobulinaemia (<6 g/L;2.16 [1.38-3.37]), and multimorbidity (1.45 [1.17-1.80]). Additional concomitant immunosuppressive use appeared to be associated with a reduced risk (0.60 [0.41-0.90]). We found no significant safety signals regarding atypical infections. Six infection-related deaths occurred at a median of 121 days (IQR 60-151) days from cohort entry. Interpretation(s): In patients with moderate-to-severe SLE, rituximab, belimumab, and standard immunosuppressive therapy have similar serious infection risks. Key risk factors for serious infections included multimorbidity, hypogammaglobulinaemia, and increased glucocorticoid doses. When considering the risk of serious infection, we propose that immunosupppressives, rituximab, and belimumab should be prioritised as mainstay therapies to optimise SLE management and support proactive minimisation of glucocorticoid use. Funding(s): None.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license
ABSTRACT
Background: Immunosuppressive agents inhibit COVID-19 vaccine antibody (Ab) responses in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Rituximab may fully block Ab responses when B cells become undetected. The effect of detected but low number of B cells due to treatment with a B-cell agent (belimumab and/or rituximab) has not been established. Purpose: We sought to examine whether there is an association between a low number of B cells due to treatment with belimumab and/or rituximab and impaired primary COVID-19 vaccination spike Ab responses in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases. Methods: We retrospectively examined Ab responses to COVID-19 vaccinations, especially in relation to B-cell counts after treatment with belimumab and/or rituximab, in 58 patients with systemic rheumatic diseases: 22 on and 36 not on B-cell agents. We used Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests for comparison of Ab values between the groups and Fisher exact test for relative risk calculations. Results: Median (interquartile range) postvaccination Ab responses were lower in patients on versus those not on B-cell agents: 3.91 (0.77-20.00) versus 20.00 (14.32-20.00), respectively. Among patients on belimumab and/or rituximab, Ab responses of less than 25% of the assay's upper limit were exclusively observed in those with B-cell counts lower than 40/µL. Patients with B-cell counts lower than 40/µL exhibit a relative risk of 6.092 (95% CI: 2.75-14.24) for Ab responses of less than 25% of the upper limit compared with patients not on B-cell agents. This relative risk remained significant, even after excluding patients with undetected B cells. Conclusion: This retrospective study found an association between low B-cell counts (less than 40/µL) and decreased Ab responses to primary COVID-19 vaccination in patients with systemic rheumatic diseases treated with belimumab and/or rituximab. Despite the small number of patients studied, these findings add to the accumulating evidence on the importance of B-cell count in predicting spike Ab responses to COVID-19 vaccination.
ABSTRACT
The 2019 Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine is a major weapon in the fight against the severe acute respiratory syndrome brought about by coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The vaccine significantly reduces the risk and severity of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) need protection from vaccine-preventable diseases including COVID-19. SLE patients have higher rates of severe infections due to immunosuppressive therapies and multiple immunologic defects - both of which are capable of blunting the immune responses after vaccination. In the management of COVID-19, recommendations have been developed to guide adjustments and/or continuation of immunosuppressive therapies for an effective immune response following vaccination with mRNA-based or viral vector-delivered vaccines. Monoclonal antibodies have also become available since December 2021. Here we present three cases of SLE patients who contracted COVID-19 after vaccination. One was managed in ambulatory settings and two required inpatient hospital admission.Copyright © 2022
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate humoral and T-cell cellular-mediated immune response after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) under Belimumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 12 patients on Belimumab and 13 age-matched healthy volunteers were recruited. Patients were in remission or in low disease activity, and they were taking no corticosteroids or only low doses. None of the patients and controls had detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies due to previous exposure to the virus. All the patients received three doses of mRNA anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and the humoral and cellular-mediated response were tested 4 weeks after the second dose (T0), 6 months after the second dose (T1) and 4 weeks after the third dose (T2). Comparison with the control group was performed at time T0 (i.e., 4 weeks after the second dose). Total anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies were analyzed using a diagnostic assay, while cellular-mediated response was evaluated using the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). RESULTS: A humoral response was documented in all the patients at T0 (median 459; IQR 225.25-758.5), but the antibody titer significantly declined from T0 to T1 (median 44.7; IQR: 30.3-202; p = 0.0066). At T2, the antibody titer significantly increased from T1 (median 2500; IQR: 2500-2500), and it was not different from T0 (respectively p < 0.0001, p = 0.66). Cellular-mediated response significantly declined from T0 to T1 (p = 0.003) but not from T0 to T2 (p = 0.3). No differences were found between patients and controls at T0 as regards both humoral and cellular responses (p = 1.0 and p = 0.09 for humoral and cellular responses, respectively). CONCLUSION: The third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine can restore both humoral and cellular immune response in SLE patients on Belimumab.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate humoral and cell-mediated response after three doses of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) treated with Belimumab (BLM). METHODS: SLE patients were vaccinated with three doses of BNT162b2-mRNA vaccine (two-dose primary vaccination, third booster dose after 6 months). The humoral immune response was assessed one and 6 months after the second dose (T1, T2), and 6 months after the booster dose (T3). Serological assay was performed (The Liaison® SARS-CoV-2 TrimericS IgG chemiluminescent). Spike-specific T-cell response was monitored 6 months after the second vaccine dose and the percentage of cytokines producing T cells was assessed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Twelve patients [12F; median age 46 years (IQR 8.25); median disease duration 156 months (IQR 188)] were enrolled. At T1, all patients showed seroconversion (median anti-Spike IgG levels 1610 BAU/mL, IQR 1390). At T2--day of the third dose--a significant reduction of median anti-Spike IgG antibodies levels was observed [214 BAU/mL (IQR 94); p = 0.0009]. Anti-Spike IgG were significantly increased at T3, reaching a median value of 1440 BAU/mL (IQR 1316; p = 0.005). Despite declining humoral immunity, almost 60% of patients mounted a virus-specific CD4 + T-cell response 6 months after primary vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: BLM does not impair humoral response to primary BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. During the follow-up, a decline in antibody levels is evident and the third dose is crucial to increase the specific immune response. Finally, we observed a recall T-cell response to the Spike antigen 6 months after the first vaccination cycle.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Humans , Middle Aged , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunoglobulin G , Antibodies, Viral , ImmunityABSTRACT
Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) currently employs agents with relatively unselective immunosuppressive properties. However, two target-specific biological drugs have been approved: belimumab (anti-B-cell-activating factor/BAFF) and anifrolumab (anti-interferon alpha receptor-1/IFNAR1). Here, we performed a comparative risk-benefit assessment for both drugs based on the role of BAFF and IFNAR1 in host defense and the pathogenesis of SLE and by considering the available data on safety and efficacy. Due to differences in target expression sites, anti-IFNAR1, but not anti-BAFF, might elicit organ-specific effects, consistent with clinical efficacy data. The IFNAR1 is specifically involved in innate and adaptive antiviral immunity in most cells of the body. Consistent with this observation, the available safety data obtained from patients negatively selected for LN and neuropsychiatric SLE, primary immunodeficiencies, splenectomy and chronic HIV, HBV, HCV infections suggest an increased risk for some viral infections such as varicella zoster and perhaps influenza. In contrast, BAFF is mainly involved in adaptive immune responses in lymphoid tissues, thus anti-BAFF therapy modulates SLE activity and prevents SLE flares without interfering with local innate host defense mechanisms and should only marginally affect immune memory to previous pathogen exposures consistent with the available safety data from SLE patients without chronic HIV, HBV or HCV infections. When using belimumab and anifrolumab, careful patient stratification and specific precautions may minimize risks and maximize beneficial treatment effects for patients with SLE.
Subject(s)
Biological Products , HIV Infections , Hepatitis C , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Humans , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
Background: A whole blood interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) based on the stimulation of SARS-Cov2-specifc memory T cells using purifed and full-lenght Spike and Nucleocapsid recombinant proteins was developed, together with anti-Spike antibody detection. Objectives: To study COVID19 vaccine cellular and humoral responses in patients with immune system diseases (ISD) and healthy controls. Methods: Non-vaccinated healthy individuals (n=103), SARS-Cov-2 infected individuals (n=9), and 104 samples from individuals having received COVID19 vaccine including 28 non-sars-cov2 infected patients with ISD diseases were included. Preliminary experiments were initiated using different platforms (ELIS-pot, IGRA, recombinant proteins or peptides) in order to evaluate Spike T cell response in volunteers vaccinated with BNT162b2 showing a S2>S1 poly-epitopic response. Results: Twenty-eight patients (25 women, 3 men;mean age 59.1(±17,8)) with various ISD were investigated. These patients suffered from lupus (n=14), vasculitis (n=4), myositis (n=2), sarcoidosis (n=2), primary immunodefciency (n=3), Sjögren's syndrome (n=2) and pericarditis (n=1). Three patients had received 4 doses, 16 three doses, and 8 two doses of vaccine (Pfzer: n=25;Moderna n=1, Astra-Zeneca n=1). One patient refused the vaccination. The tests were performed 86.7 (±60.5) days after last vaccine dose. Te n patients were on prednisone (mean dose: 11,8 mg, median 7. 5 mg, range: 5-40). Among those patients, 6 had only prednisone, 1 was also treated with belimumab, 3 with methotrexate (MTX) and 1 with azathioprine (AZA). Following COVID19 vaccination, humoral (100% in healthy vs 84.6% in ISD patients) and IGRA-Spike T cell (96% in healthy vs 59.7% in AI patients) responses took place with lower response reported among the ISD disease group (Figure 1). Humoral and cellular COVID19 vaccine responses signifcantly decrease after 100 days post vaccine. 5/5 vaccinated patients on CS alone, 2/5 vaccinated patients on corticosteroids with MTX/AZA/Belimumab and 3/17 other vaccinated patients (all being primary immunodefciency patients) had no cellular response. Humoral and T cell responses were independent from sex and age. Conclusion: Altogether, this ongoing study confrms the utility of the IGRA-Spike/-nucleocapsid assay coupled with serology in COVID19 vaccinated individuals and in particular in ISD patients treated with steroids, who may be at risk when the humoral protection decreases.
ABSTRACT
Background: Vulnerable subjects, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients have been prioritised to receive anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Questions have been raised about the effect of vaccines on immunity and their potential role as trigger for fare. Few data about the safety of these vaccines in SLE are available Objectives: To investigate the safety of different anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in SLE Methods: Data on SLE patients who have received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (from 12/2020 to 10/2021) were collected. Patients referred to 7 SLE tertiary centres (Lupus Clinic, ASST Pini-CTO, Milan;Nephrology Unit of Ospedale Giovanni Bosco, Turin;IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital;Renal and Rheumatology Units, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza;ASST Spedali Civili Brescia;Lupus Clinic IRCCS Ospedale S. Raffaele, Milan, Italy;IRCCS Policlinico, Milan) Results: 452 SLE patients who had received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were included (91% BNT162b2 mRNA, 8% mRNA-1273, 1% ChAdOx1-S). 12 (3%) were off therapy, 71% were on low-medium dose prednisone, 83% on anti-ma-larials, 50% were treated with an immunosuppressant. 9 patients transiently discontinued therapy. 119 (26%) reported adverse symptoms after the frst/second shot (12% and 21%) The most frequent were fever, local reaction, fatigue and arthralgias. Nineteen (4%) patients fared up after immunisation with a 7 days median time to relapse. Baseline demographics, SLE characteristics and therapy stratifed by adverse events and disease fare are reported in Table 1. Anti-dsDNA positivity, moderate/high DAS before vaccine and use of Belimumab were sig-nifcantly more frequent in the group of patients fared. These patients displayed a signifcantly higher rate of adverse events after vaccination. Flares consisted mainly musculoskeletal and constitutional manifestations (32%), involvement of renal (21%), cardio-respiratory (16%), hematological (16%) or mucocutaneous domains (10%) was less frequent Conclusion: our reassuring data confrm that anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is safe in SLE patients and should be recommended in this clinical setting, as potential benefts widely outweigh the risk of adverse events. Treatment adjustment might be considered with the aim of minimizing the risk of side effects and/or fare, while ensuring a satisfying protection against infection.
ABSTRACT
Background: Fatigue in SLE has a multifactorial origin and disease activity seems to contribute only minimally to its genesis. Therefore, non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies should also be considered in the management of fatigue. There is some evidence on the effectiveness of aerobic exercise programs in improving fatigue, without a negative impact on disease manifestations. Objectives: the aim of this study was to analyze fatigue and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in a monocentric cohort of patients with SLE, in a condition of stable remission or low disease activity, before and after a program of physical exercise, through the administration of validated Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs). Methods: this is a cross-sectional interventional study which included patients with SLE, aged between 18 and 55 years, in a condition of stable (≥12 months) remission (DORIS)1 or low disease activity (LLDAS)2. Patients enrolled had a FACIT score ≤40 in the previous 6 months. Patients with other possible causes of fatigue (e.g.: anemia, hypothyroidism, severe vitamin D defciency), active arthritis or physical disabilities were excluded. For each patient, demographics, comorbidities, treatment, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Disease activity was evaluated with the SELENA-SLEDAI and organ damage with the SLICC/DI. Each patient completed the following PROs before and after the interventional program: SF-36, FACIT-Fatigue, LIT, HADS. Due to the limitations related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the physical exercise sessions were carried out using the Google Meet digital platform. Patients were asked to participate to at least 70% of the lessons. The physical exercise program included moderate intensity aerobic exercises (muscle strengthening, joint mobility, breathing, static and dynamic stretching, balance and neuro-dynamics);workouts were performed 3 times a week, consisting of 60 minutes each. The program lasted for 12 weeks. Results: we enrolled 12 female patients, regularly followed at the Rheumatology Unit of Pisa;only 9 of them completed the study (mean age 38.56 ± 9.1 years;median disease duration 7 years (IQR 5,25-9,75)). 8/9 were in stable remission, while 1/9 was in LLDAS for the presence of leukopenia. 2/9 patients presented organ damage, one for cataract and one for renal insufficiency, while none presented damage in the musculoskeletal system. 33.3% of patients had fbromyalgia. 88.8% was on treatment with Hydroxy-chloroquine, 55.5% was on low dose steroids (2±1.9 mg/daily), 33.3% was on Mycophenolate Mofetil;only 1 patient was on Belimumab. All PROs showed a trend to improvement at the end of the 12-week program of physical activity (Table 1). We demonstrated a statistically signifcant improvement of: FACIT, LIT, depression score of the HADS and MCS of the SF-36. The items of role physical (RP), vitality (VT) and mental health (MH) of the SF-36 also showed a signifcant improvement. Conclusion: In a small cohort of SLE patients in remission but with severe fatigue, in the difficult context of COVID-19 pandemic, we demonstrated that an online program of physical exercise may determine a signifcant improvement of fatigue, perception of disease burden and mental health. In the context of a multidisciplinary management, fnding effective intervention programs to improve fatigue and HRQoL in SLE patients appears of utmost importance, with the fnal aim of improving patients' health status.
ABSTRACT
Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the BNT162b2 (manufactured by Pfzer-BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (manufactured by Moderna Inc) vaccines have demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and a high degree of effectiveness in preventing severe COVID-19 outcomes in healthy individuals. However, it remains to be determined if similar benefts can be replicated in immunocompro-mised patients, who were largely excluded from Phase III clinical trials. Preliminary data on vaccine immunogenicity among lupus patients reveal blunted humoral responses, particularly in those using prednisone and/or mycophenolate (1-2). Objectives: This study sought to measure the antibody responses following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with SLE and to identify clinical and laboratory parameters associated with low antibody responses. Methods: We prospectively enrolled SLE patients from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cohort (BIDLC). The patients received two doses of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 and were tested for the SARS-CoV-2 IgG spike antibody at least 4 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Patients with evidence of prior COVID-19 infection were excluded. The primary goal of this study was to measure the prevalence of a weak IgG spike antibody response and identify predictive clinical-laboratory factors. We frst measured the antibody responses in a healthy control group and defned a low antibody titer as values that fell below the 25% percentile of this reference group (<6). We then used simple logistic regression to assess for associations between different predictive variables and our predefned dichotomous outcome: <6 vs ≥6 IgG spike antibody titer. To account for potential cofounders, a multiple logistic regression model was performed. Risk ratios were calculated with the Log Binomial regression. Signifcance level was set at p <0.05. Results: A total of 71 patients were included in the study. At the time of vaccination, patients were on various immune modulator and suppressive medications, including: Hydroxychloroquine 87%, Prednisone 38%, Mycophenolate 38%, Azathioprine 18% and Belimumab 7%. The proportion of patients who received BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were 58% and 42%, respectively. Overall, 63% of patients had a high IgG spike antibody titer (≥ 6) and 37% of patients had a low IgG spike antibody titer (<6). Univariate logistic regression demonstrated that a SLEDAI ≥6 (OR: 4.55, p = 0.02), the use of azathioprine (OR: 3.55, p = 0.04) and receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine vs. mRNA-1273 (OR: 3.80, P = 0.01) were independent predictors of antibody titers <6. After controlling for age, sex, race, time to spike testing and use of immunosuppressive drugs, the association between a high SLEDAI score or receiving the BNT162b2 vaccine and a weak antibody response remained signifcant (Figure 1). Using the Log Binomial regression, the BNT162b2 and the high SLEDAI group were found to have 2.1-and 2.4-times, respectively, higher likelihood of developing weak antibody responses. Conclusion: In patients with SLE, Azathioprine use independently predicts reduced antibody titers. More importantly, we demonstrated that a pre-vaccine high disease activity score or receiving BNT162b2 (Pfzer-BioNTech) increases the risk of impaired immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with autoimmune systemic diseases have an increased risk to contract infections and develop severe complications;infections in turn can reactivated and worsen the disease itself in a vicious circle. Thus, vaccination is the main weapon to prevent infectious diseases and represents an important and safe instrument of care for rheumatic patients that needs to be further promoted. However, the immunosuppressive drugs used to treat rheumatic diseases may impair response to vaccines, in particular those targeting B or T cells directly (1). Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the B and T-cell mediated immune response to mRNA vaccination in patients with systemic autoimmune diseases, such as vasculitis or systemic connective tissue diseases, early or continuously treated with B-cell targeting therapies, rituximab (RTX) or beli-mumab (BEL), by comparing with controls and each other. Secondary we evaluated the in vitro effective neutralizing capacity in belimumab-exposed patients. Methods: Twenty-eight consecutive patients under treatment with rituximab (RTX, n=11) or belimumab (BEL, n=17) and 13 age/sex matched controls (non-rheumatic healthcare personnel) were enrolled in the study. Nobody presented anti-SARS-CoV2 antibodies related to previous viral contact and all were always negative at the molecular swab monthly control. All patients and controls received mRNA vaccines and were tested three to four weeks after complete vaccination. All RTX patients started vaccination within 5 months from the last infusion, and all but one of them were B-cell depleted. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD total antibodies were analysed by a diagnostic assay (Elecsys, Roche) while T-cell response was evaluated using the IGRA test (Euroimmun). A subgroup of BEL-patients was tested with pseudovirus neutralization assay. Results: Detectable anti-SARS-CoV2 RBD antibodies were documented in 1/11 RTX patients versus 16/17 BEL patients (p<0.0001). The median concentration was signifcantly lower than that observed in controls (39.6 AU/ml vs 1133 AU/ml, p<0.0001). A very low titer of anti-RBD antibodies were documented only in 1 out of 11 patients in the RTX subgroup (0.93 U/ml, positive if >0,79 U/ml) and the patient was the only one who showed an initial B-cell recovery (CD19+ B-cell 5 cells/microL). Anti-RBD antibodies were documented in 16 out 17 of patients in the BEL subgroup. The median anti-RBD antibody titer in patients receiving BEL was 243 [77.55-744.0] U/ml, and it was signifcantly lower compared to the controls (p=0.002). The IGRA test was positive in 8/11 (72.7%) RTX patients vs 16/17 (94.1%) BEL patients (p=0.7), with interferon release comparable to control subjects (p=0.2). Six patients with BEL were also stratifed according to total antibodies (IgG+I-gA+IgM) against-RBD into high responders (>800 AU/mL, n=3) and low responders (≤45 AU/mL, n=3) and tested with pseudovirus neutralization assay. Two thirds of low titer group of patients neutralized the Wuhan-Hu1 strain at medium-low titer (IC50 ≈102) but were almost ineffective in inhibiting the B.1.1.7 entry into target cells (IC50 =10). Regarding high responders, while two patients were able to inhibit both the strains at medium-high titer (approximately IC50 ≈103 for Wuhan-Hu1 and B.1.1.7), one patient neutralized only the WT strain. Conclusion: B-cell targeting therapies do not preclude SARS-CoV-2 vaccination since a cellular immunity can raise even in the absence of circulating B cells. Most importantly, the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccination in SLE patients treated with belimumab is supported. However, patients showing the lowest humoral response to vaccine could remain at higher risk of infections, due to low neutralizing capacity.
ABSTRACT
Background: Patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) are commonly treated with immunosuppressors and prone to infections. Recently introduced mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines have demonstrated extraordinary efficacy across all ages. Immunosuppressed patients were excluded from phase III trials with SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccines. Objectives: To fully characterize B and T cell immune responses elicited by mRNA SARS-Cov2 vaccines in patients with rheumatic diseases under immunotherapies, and to identify which drugs reduce vaccinés immunogenicity. Methods: Humoral, CD4 and CD8 immune-responses were investigated in 100 SARS-Cov2-naïve patients with selected rheumatic diseases under immunosup-pression after a two-dose regimen of SARS-Cov2 mRNA vaccine. Responses were compared with age, gender, and disease-matched IMRD patients not receiving immunosuppressors and with healthy controls. Results: IMRD patients showed decreased seroconversion rates (80% vs 100%, p= 0.03) and cellular immune responses (75% vs 100%, p= 0.02). Patients on methotrexate achieved seroconversion in 62% of cases and cellular responses in 80% of cases. Abatacept decreased humoral and cellular responses. Rituximab (31% responders) and belimumab (50% responders) showed impaired humoral responses, but cellular responses were often preserved. Antibody titers were reduced with mycophenolate and azathioprine but preserved with lefunomide and anticytokines. Conclusion: IMRD patients exhibit impaired SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-immuno-genicity, variably reduced with immunosuppressors. Among commonly used therapies, abatacept and B-cell depleting therapies show deleterious effects, while anticytokines preserved immunogenicity. The effects of cumulative meth-otrexate and glucocorticoid doses on immunogenicity should be considered. Humoral and cellular responses are weakly correlated, but CD4 and CD8 tightly correlate. Seroconversion alone might not refect the vaccine's immunogenicity.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate B-cell- and T-cell-mediated immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in patients with complex or rare systemic autoimmune diseases previously been treated with or under continuous treatment with B-cell-targeted therapies including rituximab (RTX) and belimumab (BEL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive patients receiving RTX (n = 11) or BEL (n = 17) treatment and 13 age-/sex-matched controls (non-rheumatic healthcare personnel) were recruited. None of the patients had detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies caused by prior exposure to the virus. All the patients and controls received mRNA vaccines and were tested three to four weeks after completion of vaccination. In all the RTX patients, vaccination was started within 5 months from the last infusion, and B-cell depletion was confirmed in all but one of them. Total anti-SARS-CoV-2 RBD antibodies were analyzed using a diagnostic assay, while T-cell response was evaluated using the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA). Further, SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses were employed to verify the strain-specific neutralizing capacity of the antibodies. RESULTS: Detectable anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were documented in 1 out of the 11 RTX patients and 16 of the 17 BEL patients. The median concentration in the RTX and BEL patients was significantly lower than that in the controls (39.6 AU/ml vs. 1133 AU/ml, p = 0.002). The result of IGRA was positive in 8 of the 11 (72.7%) RTX patients and 16 of the 17 (94.1%) BEL patients, and interferon release in both the RTX and BEL patients was comparable to that in the control participants. CONCLUSION: B-cell-targeted therapies do not preclude SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, since virus-specific cellular immunity can be induced even in the absence of circulating B cells. An important finding was that lupus patients treated with BEL developed immune responses to SARS-CoV-2; this indicates retention of the immunogenicity of the COVID-19 vaccine.